Thu, 4/24/14 6:00 PM - 8:30 PM
Greens for Campos (phone banking)


Fri, 4/25/14 7:00 PM - 8:00 PM
Food Not Bombs needs your help Fridays 7 pm UN Plaza


Sat, 4/26/14 11:00 AM - 1:00 PM
People's Earth Day Walk


Sun, 4/27/14 2:00 PM - 4:00 PM
Occupy Action Council--Coalition


Mon, 4/28/14 6:00 PM - 9:00 PM
Occupy SF Forum

get our newsletter or



Save the Post Office! Protest @Staples Van Ness branch, 10 am-noon Thursday 4/24:…

4 hours ago

Our monthly meeting is tonight at 7 at our new office in the Redstone Building. Agenda:…

17 hours ago

It's rare when the message and its muscle coincide.

Retweeted 1 day ago

Supervisor @AvalosSF introduced legislation to allow SF to join other CCAs (Marin Clean Energy) at today's @sfbos mtg. #EarthDay

Retweeted 1 day ago

To the 60% of Americans who want a third party, here's how you get a third party: (1) register in those parties, (2) vote for those parties.

Retweeted 2 days ago

Happy #EarthDay, everyone! Great day to join the Green Party:

2 days ago

Tomorrow protest Ed Lee's Earth Day breakfast. SF has a 0-50-100 strategy for climate change, Ed Lee is a BIG ZERO!…

Retweeted 3 days ago

Heads up! @mayoredlee will be on @KQEDForum this morning 10-11am. Tweet your tough questions to KQED now.

Retweeted 3 days ago

I don't know..I just don't

Retweeted 5 days ago

@MFlowers8 Asks the most important question about #Obamacare. Watch:…

Retweeted 5 days ago


Cat Food Commission is Back

Social Security after ObamaGlenn Greenwald posted a really insightful article today about Obama's continuing attempts to kill off Social Security and Medicare.

While Pelosi and other liberal Democrats have immediately gone into damage control mode, Greenwald points out that although the liberal wing of the Democratic Party will make noise, they will ultimately fall in line, just like those congresspeople who flip-flopped on the mandatory health insurance bill after signing a pledge not to support it.

Greenwald effectively busts the myth of the "spineless Democrat:"

When I first began writing about politics in late 2005, the standard liberal blogosphere critique -- one I naively believed back then -- was that Democrats were capitulating so continuously to the Bush agenda because they "lacked spine" and were inept political strategists: i.e., they found those policies so very offensive but were simply unwilling or unable to resist them.  It became apparent to me that this was little more than a self-soothing conceit: Democrats continuously voted for Bush policies because they were either indifferent to their enactment or actively supported them, and were owned and controlled by the same factions as the GOP.

Greenwald also makes the point that the Democratosphere (e.g., MoveOn, Daily Kos, FDL) will also predictably fall in line after a token protest:

Similarly, those progressive commentators who are first and foremost Democratic loyalists -- who rose up in angry and effective unison (along with actual progressives) to prevent George Bush from privatizing Social Security in 2005 -- will mount no meaningful opposition out of fear of weakening the President's political prospects.

Their ability to neuter opposition to deeply regressive ideas has led other insightful bloggers to conclude that Democrats are worse than Republicans.  While Greenwald doesn't go that far, the results may, unfortunately, speak for themselves.

(We expressed some of the same thoughts in our 2010 Green Voter Guide as well, although not as eloquently as GG.)