The SF Green Party has endorsed the following candidates and propositions for November 2013. See below for longer explanations.
Don't forget to connect the arrow next to "write-in" as well.
- A: NO - potential raid on retiree health trust fund
- B: NO - wall on the waterfront / more condos for millionaires
- C: NO - (similar to B) wall on the waterfront / more condos for millionaires
- D: YES - statement in favor of cheaper prescription drugs
Other Local Offices:
Voter Guide (detailed explanations):
The SF Green Party will host a candidate forum this Wednesday, 9/25--come ask questions to candidates in the races for D4 (Sunset) Supervisor, City Attorney, Assessor, and Treasurer. The forum will take place from 7-9 pm in the Community Room at the Taraval/Parkside Police Station, 2345 24th Ave, in the Sunset. The event is open to the public and all are invited!
Please read candidates' answers to our Supervisorial questionnaire in advance, so we don't ask them questions they've already answered on the record. We received the following response from D4 Supervisorial candidates (all 3 were invited but only one responded):
Supervisorial candidates (D4): Mike Murphy (write in candidate)
Note that we do not currently have questionnaires for the other citywide contests; all candidates from those contests were invited.
The Green Party's 2012 Presidential Candidate, Jill Stein, has recently spoken out on many issues, from trying to stop the war drums against Syria to fighting the Trans Pacific Partnership. Dr. Stein will be visiting the Bay Area from September 15-18, including an event in San Francisco on Monday, September 16!
The SF Green Party & Occupy SF Forum present:
2012 Green Party Presidential Candidate Jill Stein
Mon 9/16, 6-9 pm
Location: UNITE HERE Local 2 Action Room
209 Golden Gate Ave @ Leavenworth
near Civic Ctr BART
Free! Donations to Occupy SF and SF Green Party are welcome.
Seats 150+, so invite anybody interested in building an alternative to the 2-party system.
If you live in the North Bay and can't come to our event, Jill will also be speaking at the Petaluma Progressive Festival (http://www.progressivefestival.org/) on September 15.
She will also attend several house party fundraisers for Single Payer Now in Oakland and SF: RSVP to either for details on locations:
After Wednesday's historic Supreme Court rulings legalizing same-sex marriage in CA, and overturning part of DOMA, the Green Party put out a press release praising the decisions. But after this weekend's celebrations, there's still much work to be done, as New York Green Drew Langdon acknowledged:
We commit to continue the struggle because we understand that equality means more than marriage equality. The struggle continues, as we work to make full protections for our transgender siblings a reality. The struggle continues as we ensure that every LGBTQI person has enough food to eat, a roof over their heads, and the proper care for a healthy life. The struggle continues as we work to ensure the basic dignity and human rights that we all deserve.
The Supreme Court ruling removes the last remnants of protection for poor and minority voters and will openly invite new and creative ways to repress the most vulnerable people in our society.
What the Supreme Court should have done is expand the principles of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 into the emerging Jim Crow states of Ohio, Indiana, and Pennsylvania.
The Green Party thinks we need far stronger protections than those that had been guaranteeed by the Voting Rights Act, including an acknowledgement of everybody's right to vote and have your vote counted, and fair access to run as a candidate.
As we approach the much loved San Francisco Gay Pride Parade June 29-30 the controversy surrounding the election of Bradley Manning as Grand Marshall continues to boil.
On April 25th, several newspapers (here and here) reported that Army Private First Class Bradley Manning was chosen by Pride’s electoral college as Grand Marshall for the 2014 Parade. However, the next day (April 26th) Pride board President Lisa Williams released a highly controversial and widely criticized missive attempting to annihilate the electoral college’s decision not only from Pride's parade process but from history itself. In harsh words which have been characterized as unseemly and authoritarian, Lisa Williams refused ‘even the hint’ of support for Bradley Manning as a whistle-blower and assured that any person involved had been ‘disciplined.’
This lead to an outcry by many organizations who support the actions of the Nobel Peace Prize nominee Manning, actions, which while illegal, brought to light incredible crimes of war and crimes against humanity perpetuated by the US Military. Due to the protestation of many activists, a hearing was scheduled by the Pride board for May 7th to discuss the selection and swift removal of Manning as Grand Marshal. That meeting was cancelled and the board met privately, much to the chagrin of interested parties.
In an age when the President of Hope has done more to crackdown on whistleblowers than all of the previous presidents combined and the government is actively creating an atmosphere of fear around telling the truth, it is worrisome to many to see Gay Pride falling victim to this intellectual malfeasance.
There is no violence in holding a hearing; there is no lack of security in allowing people to voice their opinions. When a group like Pride Inc implies that the concerned citizens protesting the closed door reversal of a popular decision is a threat to security we must begin to worry for them.
While the web was swarmed this week with climate change articles, the message boards were swamped with comments from an active group who seem to honestly and truly believe that there is nothing wrong with burning as much fuel and creating as much waste as possible.
This very noisy minority has done a great job, thus far, in obfuscating the fact that climate change is a very important issue according to the federal government and that the scientific community has come to a consensus regarding the pressing nature of changing the way our species burns fuel and creates waste.
Where are our leaders in Congress? Why aren’t they leading us to change?
Two reasons: First, wealthy interests have spent tons of money confusing people about the real impact of climate change. Second: Big businesses and rich individuals profiting from the use of fossil fuels are bribing our congresspeople at an alarming rate.
These are important things to consider as President Obama weighs arguments on the permit decision for the Keystone XL Pipeline. Proponents of the pipeline argue that it will not spill very often and will create jobs, even though most scientists agree that tar sands oil will be a huge problem for the global environment.
What about the Keytstone I pipeline? The one they started using in 2010 and claimed would spill only once every 7 years? Oh yeah, it spilled 12 times in 12 months.
But just look at how much money backers of the pipeline are spending!